Skip to content

[Quality-2][High] Reconcile invoice status transitions without optimistic corruption #994

Description

@greatest0fallt1me

Summary

Implement Reconcile invoice status transitions without optimistic corruption as a production-ready improvement in this repository.

Why this matters

Users need truthful, recoverable interactions during refreshes, empty states, errors, and account changes.

Scope

Trace the affected public entry point through persistence, external dependencies, and user/operator-visible output. Implement Reconcile invoice status transitions without optimistic corruption without weakening existing authorization, correctness, compatibility, or CI safeguards.

Priority

High

Acceptance criteria

  • The UI renders authoritative state and never reports unconfirmed mutations as successful.
  • Loading, empty, stale, error, retry, cancellation, and account-switch states are explicit.
  • Refreshes, pagination, filters, and concurrent responses cannot overwrite newer state.
  • Component/integration tests cover the primary flow and relevant races.

Validation

The PR must include focused regression coverage for this issue, including:

  • The UI renders authoritative state and never reports unconfirmed mutations as successful.
  • Loading, empty, stale, error, retry, cancellation, and account-switch states are explicit.
  • Refreshes, pagination, filters, and concurrent responses cannot overwrite newer state.

Run the repository’s standard formatting, lint, build, and test commands where applicable, and report unrelated pre-existing failures separately.

Non-goals

  • Typo-only, formatting-only, or documentation-only changes.
  • Unrelated refactors, dependency upgrades, or broad redesigns.
  • Weakening security, authorization, CI, validation, or production safeguards.
  • Changing public behavior outside this issue’s scope.

Contributor application

Before implementation, comment with relevant experience, a concise implementation approach, expected files or modules, and an estimate for opening the first PR. Wait for maintainer assignment before coding.

PR requirements

Use a feature branch and include Closes #<issue-number>. The PR must address every acceptance criterion, link each criterion to code and tests, explain security and failure-mode handling, include meaningful regression coverage, preserve compatibility, and report validation results.

Quality review

This is a substantive engineering issue. Review will consider correctness, security, failure handling, test quality, scope discipline, and maintainability.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Stellar WaveStellar Wave Program issue

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions