Hi, I have been working on pulling together a zip document that compiles the previously shared comparisons. These files include figures showing pSA differences coloured according to datetime, magnitude and rupture distance, PGA differences, and direct waveform comparisons. The file structure is organized by magnitude -> comparison channels -> figure type. Currently I have generated comparisons between HH and HN channels for M ranges of 4.5 - 5 and 5 - 6. I have also included CSV files with the intensity measure data for channel pairs, as well as a CSV with mean PSA differences and standard deviations for each station.
Here is a Dropbox link for the data: https://www.dropbox.com/s/30ix5mn28a80hnb/gm_compare.zip?dl=0
Here is an example of the new waveform comparison figures. Note that the data for both instrument types are displayed in acceleration units of m/s**2. Seismometer data was converted to acceleration using previously described pre-processing techniques.
I hope that this will prove to be a valuable resource. I plan to update this in the future with alternative channel comparisons and M 4 - 4.5 data.
Hi, I have been working on pulling together a zip document that compiles the previously shared comparisons. These files include figures showing pSA differences coloured according to datetime, magnitude and rupture distance, PGA differences, and direct waveform comparisons. The file structure is organized by magnitude -> comparison channels -> figure type. Currently I have generated comparisons between HH and HN channels for M ranges of 4.5 - 5 and 5 - 6. I have also included CSV files with the intensity measure data for channel pairs, as well as a CSV with mean PSA differences and standard deviations for each station.
Here is a Dropbox link for the data: https://www.dropbox.com/s/30ix5mn28a80hnb/gm_compare.zip?dl=0
Here is an example of the new waveform comparison figures. Note that the data for both instrument types are displayed in acceleration units of m/s**2. Seismometer data was converted to acceleration using previously described pre-processing techniques.
I hope that this will prove to be a valuable resource. I plan to update this in the future with alternative channel comparisons and M 4 - 4.5 data.