Skip to content

Don't even suggest removing async on overrides - #76

Merged
ejball merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ejball/ide0391-none
Aug 24, 2026
Merged

Don't even suggest removing async on overrides#76
ejball merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ejball/ide0391-none

Conversation

@ejball

@ejball ejball commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

At least with non-overrides the author could consider making the method synchronous.

At least with non-overrides the author could consider making the method synchronous.
@bgrainger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Runtime async will probably make both IDE0390 and IDE0391 obsolete, but we certainly don't need IDE0391 right now. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0390-ide0391

@ejball
ejball merged commit 8c3c309 into master Aug 24, 2026
5 checks passed
@ejball
ejball deleted the ejball/ide0391-none branch August 24, 2026 14:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants