🟢 Catch Me Live on Discord

Zero trust, evidences makes senses.

I don't trust a fix without enough evidences and can't be proved. Every real problem goes through DDRG (Dynamic Decomposition Reasoning Graph). It's a decision-graph methodology I built myself. It's not an established framework, and you won't find it written up anywhere else. No trusting "the standard solution" by default, no closing a decision without evidence behind it.

flowchart TD

    A["Real problem / observed failure"] --> B["Reproduce + collect evidence"]
    B --> C["Inspect the actual system"]
    C --> D["Map architecture, ownership, lifecycle & dependencies"]
    D --> E["Extract requirements, constraints, unknowns & failure modes"]

    E --> F["DDRG decomposition"]

    F --> G["Break into meaningful problem nodes"]
    G --> H["Attach requirements, assumptions, dependencies & proof obligations"]
    H --> I{"Unresolved dependency?"}

    I -- Yes --> G
    I -- No --> J["Enumerate candidates"]

    J --> J1["Existing / standard"]
    J --> J2["Custom"]
    J --> J3["Hybrid"]
    J --> J4["Defer / do nothing"]

    J1 --> K
    J2 --> K
    J3 --> K
    J4 --> K

    K["Targeted research / experiments / upstream evidence"]
    K --> L["Compare correctness, failure behavior, compatibility, performance & complexity"]
    L --> M{"Enough evidence?"}

    M -- No --> K
    M -- Yes --> N["Bind decision locally + define rollback conditions"]

    N --> O["Detailed implementation plan"]
    O --> P["AI-assisted implementation in small slices"]

    P --> Q["Inspect the actual diff"]
    Q --> R["Regression + negative + failure-path tests"]
    R --> S["Adversarial self-audit"]
    S --> T["Full CI / static / integration validation"]
    T --> U["Runtime validation where necessary"]

    U --> V{"Evidence contradicts a decision?"}

    V -- Yes --> W["REOPEN the affected DDRG node"]
    W --> G

    V -- No --> X["Re-audit the FINAL state"]
    X --> Y["Ship / deploy reversibly"]
    Y --> Z["Observe real behavior"]

    Z --> AA{"Reality contradicts a resolved claim?"}

    AA -- Yes --> W
    AA -- No --> AB["Record evidence / regression guards / lessons"]

    AB -. "next problem" .-> A

Languages

Frameworks / Platforms / Tools

Databases

I always welcome who want to play with me but I don't like toxic ones.

Daily mechanical gacha.

Some days I look suspiciously competent. Other days I appear to have forgotten how a mouse works.

Peak · Immortal 1 · 50 RR Riot ID · ItzHerzchen#ILYVM Shard · SEA

Started because of someone. Still here in case they ever come back.

Mostly here for combat, build optimization, and the story.

Exploration usually happens when the Primogem situation becomes sufficiently desperate.

Also somehow managed an 8-loss 50/50 streak — yes, I'm counting Capturing Radiance too.

UID · 1802761525 Server · Asia

Pure support player.

I mostly play dedicated buff / support heroes.

If I've decided you're the one I'm protecting, there's a decent chance the entire team dies before you do.

IGN · 龍•Hεrƶϲћεηッ

Beautiful world. Excellent combat. Apparently that was enough.

I came for the visuals and stayed because the combat actually feels good.

UID · 908083609 Server · SEA

Mostly female characters from Genshin Impact, Zenless Zone Zero, Wuthering Waves, and whatever else manages to catch my attention.

I prefer source-accurate cosplay.

I'm happy to see how close I can get to the original character. Not just the outfit, but the overall impression.

The other part is getting to step into a completely different version of myself for a while.

Considering people can already get wildly different impressions of me depending on when and how they know me, that part feels strangely appropriate.

Fast rhythmic tracks, remixes, electronic stuff, or something completely different when the mood changes.

💛 Feeling generous? Support me and my work on PayPal