The project does not define which C standard it uses. Reading the code, I think it follows C89 and is compatible with C23.
I suggest to define C11 as the minimal standard. It is widely supported and allows code to be better readable. The thing I miss most is declaring the variable in a for-loop ( for (int i = 0; i <n; i++)) instead of defining the variable at the beginning of the function.
If you agree, I can open a pull request setting the C standard.
The project does not define which C standard it uses. Reading the code, I think it follows C89 and is compatible with C23.
I suggest to define C11 as the minimal standard. It is widely supported and allows code to be better readable. The thing I miss most is declaring the variable in a for-loop (
for (int i = 0; i <n; i++)) instead of defining the variable at the beginning of the function.If you agree, I can open a pull request setting the C standard.