Copy register: manifesto home, plain tool pages - #34
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The visual review's P0: every page spoke in the same voice. Uppercase
English eyebrows narrated design intent over Chinese headings ("SIX
DELIBERATE STEPS", "TRUST IS INSPECTABLE") on all 22 page files, and
every h1 used the same two-clause manifesto formula, download page and
security page included. Both patterns are the loudest tells of the
generated-site look this redesign pass exists to remove — and neither
carried information: the labels praised the design, and a tool page's
slogan hid what the page was.
The register now splits by the page's job. The home page keeps its
manifesto voice — that is where a thesis belongs — with its eyebrows
in Chinese (本地优先 · 自带 API Key) or functional (激活流程, 兼容目录).
Tool pages get noun titles that say what they are: 下载 BootAgent,
六步完成第一次激活, 帮助文档, 安全、隐私与发行完整性, Agent 兼容目录,
Provider 目录, 支持与反馈, 企业服务, 更新日志, 配置目录. Where the
breadcrumb already names the page, the eyebrow that repeated it in
English is simply gone; section-level eyebrows become functional labels
(发行完整性, 商业关系披露). English pages follow the same rule in their
own language. The .eyebrow style drops uppercase tracking for sentence
case — the cap treatment is what forced those labels into English in
the first place.
The copy pass also retires the provocations the review flagged: 糊弄你,
伪装成, 假装, 偷偷 — each replaced by the plain factual claim it was
dressing up. Boundary statements that are product promises (不提供共享
Key…) are untouched.
The six visual baselines re-render at new fractional pixel offsets
because the hero above the console changed height; content verified
identical, same mechanism as the two previous regenerations.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
First implementation step of the approved site-style review (P0 tier: the text layer). The review's finding: the site's bones are mature, but the skin stacks generated-site defaults — and the loudest of those are textual, not chromatic.
What changed
Eyebrow layer. All 22 page files carried uppercase-tracked English labels over Chinese headings — and they narrated design intent ("Six deliberate steps", "Trust is inspectable", "Support without lock-in") rather than informing. Now: where the breadcrumb already names the page, the duplicate eyebrow is gone; where a label earns its place it is functional and in the page's language (激活流程, 兼容目录, 发行完整性, 商业关系披露).
.eyebrowdropstext-transform: uppercase+ tracking for sentence case — the cap styling is what forced English in the first place. The one data-driven eyebrow (agent group on detail pages) is untouched.H1 register. The home page keeps its manifesto voice — a thesis belongs in the hero. Every tool page moves from slogan to noun: 下载 BootAgent · 六步完成第一次激活 · 帮助文档 · 安全、隐私与发行完整性 · Agent 兼容目录 · Provider 目录 · 配置目录 · 支持与反馈 · 企业服务 · 更新日志 · 页面不存在 (404). English pages follow the same split in English.
Copy pass. The provocations flagged in review are retired — 糊弄你 / 伪装成 / 假装 / 偷偷 each replaced by the factual claim it was dressing up (e.g. "真实目录，不用一张静态兼容表糊弄你" → "目录来自真实仓库数据，不是一张静态兼容表"). Factual boundary promises (不提供共享 Key，不代理模型请求…) are deliberately untouched — that register is the product's, not the template's.
Not in this PR (next steps per the approved plan): accent-ratio inversion, latin/mono data-voice typography, HeroParticles removal and motion consolidation.
Test plan
GITHUB_TOKEN: 216 passed / 18 skipped — baseline-identical🤖 Generated with Claude Code