Skip to content

Protein-level entrapment for non-specific (HLA) searches: shuffled tryptic blocks recreate target peptides #19

Description

@RomJ25

Hi, and thank you for FDRBench. I have a question about using protein-level shuffled entrapment with a non-specific immunopeptidomics search.

Setup

  • FDRBench 1.2.0, -level protein -fold 10 -fix_nc c -check, default enzyme (Trypsin, no P rule)
  • Search: MSFragger with non-specific digestion (num_enzyme_termini = 0), 7-25 aa, HLA class I data
  • I checked every accepted entrapment-target peptide for an exact match to the real target sequences in the same database

What I see
At 1% FDR, 99 of the 157 unique accepted entrapment-target peptides (63%) also occur exactly in a real target protein. 120 of the 157 span a junction between two shuffled tryptic blocks, and none come from a shuffle that left the sequence unchanged.

That makes sense for a tryptic search, where each shuffled block is what gets matched. A non-specific search can match any 7-25-residue window, including windows that cross block boundaries, so those real sequences can come back through the entrapment proteins.

Questions

  1. For non-specific searches, is -enzyme 0 the intended setting for protein-level entrapment, or would you recommend a different approach?
  2. Would a window-level check (every peptide in the search's length range against the target set) be in scope for FDRBench, or is that better done downstream?

Happy to share the scripts I used for the check.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions