Skip to content

Documentation Review Changes - #93

Draft
rogurr wants to merge 6 commits into
OpenDevicePartnership:mainfrom
rogurr:file_review_1
Draft

Documentation Review Changes#93
rogurr wants to merge 6 commits into
OpenDevicePartnership:mainfrom
rogurr:file_review_1

Conversation

@rogurr

@rogurr rogurr commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Removed specific files no longer needed due to documentation in the Patina repository.

This PR is just removing those files and fixing up links to the proper Patina book pages, it does not address content within the existing files.

@makubacki

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rogurr, this looks like the right direction. Please let me know when it's ready for review (since it is currently in draft).

@rogurr

rogurr commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@rogurr, this looks like the right direction. Please let me know when it's ready for review (since it is currently in draft).

@makubacki, I'm going to ping Phil and Jerry about this PR and let them decide to take it as is or use it in one of their PRs since they are responsible for the full documentation update.

This is just a confirmation that the data in the files deleted did not contain any information that is not already in the Patina documents. I documented in each task why I could remove the file and linked as appropriate in the repo or the task.

@makubacki

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rogurr, this looks like the right direction. Please let me know when it's ready for review (since it is currently in draft).

@makubacki, I'm going to ping Phil and Jerry about this PR and let them decide to take it as is or use it in one of their PRs since they are responsible for the full documentation update.

This is just a confirmation that the data in the files deleted did not contain any information that is not already in the Patina documents. I documented in each task why I could remove the file and linked as appropriate in the repo or the task.

Sounds good. I'm mainly interested in looking through the Patina-related content being deleted and confirming that it's all gone. If that's already done, great. I'd expect anything to be really outdated and inconsequential to the Patina docs.

@philgweber philgweber left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree in removing these since they are all documented in Patina already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants