Skip to content

ci: run the test suite on every push and pull request - #6

Open
Swissystem7 wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
docs/ci-doc-20260907-143624
Open

Swissystem7 wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
docs/ci-doc-20260907-143624

Conversation

@Swissystem7

@Swissystem7 Swissystem7 commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Document-only draft from the hive (Grok Bot deliverable ingested by ingest_docs.sh). Contains exactly one Markdown file: .github/workflows/validate.yml. No code, no merge, for the owner's reading and decision.

אימות

נכתב אוטומטית ב-17.09.2026 07:45. כל שורה כאן נמדדה — אין בסעיף הזה שום טקסט שמודל כתב.

מה שנמדד מכנית — בלי מודל

  • אין דוח שערים לענף הזה. לא ידוע אם בדיקת רגרסיה כלשהי נכשלה לפני ועברה אחרי. זה לא אומר שהקוד רע; זה אומר שאין הוכחה.
  • נוחת נקי על origin/master בסדר שתור המיזוג חישב
  • מה באמת משתנה: 3 קבצי מימוש (+30 −2) ו-1 קבצי בדיקה (+5)
    • קבצי המימוש: .github/workflows/validate.yml, case/index.html, docs/TESTING.md

טיוטה בלבד. לא מוזג, לא נדחף, לא הוצא מטיוטה.

hive-docs and others added 2 commits September 7, 2026 14:36
Document-only change ingested by ingest_docs.sh; no code touched. Draft PR for the owner's reading and decision; nothing merged.
The honesty rule banned .github/workflows outright, so the repo's own
suite failed on the workflow this PR adds. Replace the blanket ban with
a precise assertion: the workflow directory holds exactly validate.yml,
and that file never merges, force-pushes or deploys. Update the two
places that claimed there is no CI (docs/TESTING.md and case/index.html)
so the prose matches reality. README.md made no such claim.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Swissystem7 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2026
The README linked to PURPOSE.md, which is not in the repository and is
not added by any open pull request. The purpose document is
docs/PURPOSE-SmartMount.md, added by open Draft PR #5, so the link now
points at that path and names the pending PR, matching how the same
dated section already cites #3, #4, #6 and #9.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Swissystem7
Swissystem7 marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2026 22:54

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant