fix: refuse branding a station without a recipe

[Drefvelin]

Summary

Left-clicking a crafting station with the branding tool before a recipe is chosen called craft() with a null recipe. It threw a NullPointerException (seen on TFMCMain 2026-09-23 20:37). The player now gets "No recipe on this station. Select a recipe first."

Verification

• mvn package builds.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • When no recipe is available, crafting now displays a message and plays a failure sound instead of attempting to craft.

[coderabbitai]

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 2a2baef5-578e-4c59-9b5e-debc6333d33a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 689e0ea and 3bb16cf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/main/java/net/tfminecraft/advancedcrafting/managers/CraftingManager.java

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 8 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The branding tool crafting flow now checks whether the station has a recipe. If it does not, the player receives a selection prompt and failure sound, and crafting stops.

Changes

Branding tool crafting

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Check recipe before crafting src/main/java/net/tfminecraft/advancedcrafting/managers/CraftingManager.java	When the station has no recipe, applyHit sends a selection prompt and failure sound, then returns without calling station.craft(p).

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Bug fix

Suggested reviewers: ryanbarlow97

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 3bb16

The change prevents branding without a selected recipe from reaching the failing craft call. No actionable merge-blocking risk remains.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 1 files.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: preventing branding when a station has no recipe.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

• Fix all pre-merge checks with AI

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

📝 Generate docstrings 💡

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

---

_{A rabbit checks the recipe first,
No recipe? Crafting does not burst.
A prompt appears, a sound rings clear,
The station waits for choices here.
I hop along, my work is done.}

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}