Skip to content

content: Codex plan value analysis guide (zh+en) - #101

Merged
WhiteWorld merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
content/codex-plan-value-analysis
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

content: Codex plan value analysis guide (zh+en)#101
WhiteWorld merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
content/codex-plan-value-analysis

Conversation

@WhiteWorld

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

New bilingual guide 《Codex 套餐性价比分析(2026)》 (/zh/guides/codex-plan-value-analysis/ + /en/...): who should buy Plus / Pro 5x / Pro 20x / Business / API Key, per-model 5-hour window usage tables (GPT-5.6 Sol/Terra/Luna + GPT-5.5/5.4/mini), credits rate card, limit-hit options, cost math, and comparison with Claude Max + domestic coding plans, with a sources-and-review-dates section.

Data sourcing (per reviewer requirements for pricing articles)

  • Plan structure ($20/$100/$200), per-tier usage ranges, credits rate card, Voice allowances, feature matrix: OpenAI Codex official docs (developers.openai.com/codex/pricing), verified 2026-08-19 (fetched today, quoted facts only; usage numbers are official ranges, labeled as such).
  • Frontmatter complete: pillar=plans, content_status=keep, locale_strategy=mirrored, date, tags, article_type=review; zh/en mirrored with same slug.
  • No tool-count promises in title/description.

Internal links (zh/en)

  • claude-max-plan-value-analysis (published today), claude-code-vs-codex (compare), glm-5.3-coding-plan-review, glm-vs-deepseek-vs-kimi-2026 (compare).

Local gates (node v22.23.1 / npm 10.9.8, all exit=0)

  • content:check --strict: 0 error / 0 warning (guides zh/en now 52/46)
  • build: 321 pages (+2 new guide pair); check:seo passed; content tests 1/1; npm audit: 0 vulnerabilities

Base

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
codepick Building Building Preview Aug 19, 2026 2:43pm

@WhiteWorld
WhiteWorld marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2026 14:57
@WhiteWorld
WhiteWorld merged commit fd90fd8 into main Aug 19, 2026
3 checks passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d492603383

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

## 和 Claude Max / 国产方案对比

- **Claude Max 5x/20x($100/$200)**:结构几乎一模一样(5 小时窗口 + 周上限 + 全端共享 + credits 续跑)。差异在模型生态:Claude 的 Opus 系在长代码生成上仍是站内评分最高(9.6/10),Codex 的 GPT-5.6 系在 Agent 编排和 GitHub 原生集成(@Codex 委派 PR/issue、自动 Code Review)上更强。纠结选型的看 [Claude Code vs Codex 对比](/zh/compare/claude-code-vs-codex/)。
- **国产 Coding Plan(GLM / 方舟 / 百炼)**:月费 ¥50-200,人民币直付、国内直连。Codex 的 chatgpt.com 访问与支付在国内有现实摩擦(站内 `codex-cli` 数据 china_friendly 仅 1/10)。预算敏感、人在国内:优先国产方案,详见 [GLM-5.3 Coding Plan 评测](/zh/guides/glm-5.3-coding-plan-review/) 和 [GLM vs DeepSeek vs Kimi 对比](/zh/compare/glm-vs-deepseek-vs-kimi-2026/)。

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Point the GLM link at the generated slug

The build generates this article at /zh/guides/glm-53-coding-plan-review/, not the dotted /zh/guides/glm-5.3-coding-plan-review/, and there is no matching redirect, so readers following this link receive a 404. Update this URL and the equivalent link in the mirrored English article to use the generated glm-53-coding-plan-review slug.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L168-L168

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant