docs(runtime): define safe recovery for PDF rejections - #4818
Open
seekskyworld wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs(runtime): define safe recovery for PDF rejections#4818seekskyworld wants to merge 1 commit into
seekskyworld wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Generated-by: OpenAI Codex Signed-off-by: seekskyworld <djh1813553759@gmail.com>
seekskyworld
force-pushed
the
docs/3285-pdf-rejection-recovery
branch
from
September 5, 2026 02:28
6709337 to
08dd40d
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Refs #3285
Records the current runtime decision for provider PDF rejections: Maka does not perform a PDF-free retry until a provider adapter supplies structured, request-level evidence that proves the rejection occurred before provider work or tool effects. The document now includes the exact parsed error shapes accepted by the current classifier and the source paths audited.
Verification
git diff --checkpackages/runtime/src/provider-error-classification.ts,packages/runtime/src/model-adapter.ts, andpackages/core/src/attachments.tsAI use
Tool(s) and scope: OpenAI Codex authored the decision document and reviewed the linked runtime contracts.
Checklist
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?