perf: improve CLI startup speed and local build speed

[devxdh]

Hello!

Since I hadn't gotten feedback on #2269 yet, I put together this Draft PR to show a working prototype of the startup speed improvements, along with a couple of quick build speed optimizations I found while working on it.

What's in this PR:

1. CLI Startup Speed (Lazy Loading)

   • Converted the top-level @asyncapi/parser import in src/apps/cli/internal/base.ts to import type and added a lazy getter/loader. Now, running basic commands doesn't parse @asyncapi/parser right away.
   • Deferred loading ValidationService, ValidationStatus, and ConversionService in validate.ts and convert.ts until run() or diagnostic handlers execute.

2. Local Build Speed (tsc --incremental)

   • Added "incremental": true and "tsBuildInfoFile": "./.tsbuildinfo" to tsconfig.json (and added .tsbuildinfo to .gitignore). This caches AST metadata so tsc doesn't re-compile all ~200 files from scratch on minor edits.

3. Skipping Example ZIP Downloads on Build

   • Updated scripts/fetch-asyncapi-example.js to check if assets/examples/examples.json already exists locally before fetching the 2MB zip from GitHub. I also added a FORCE_FETCH_EXAMPLES=true environment flag in case anyone wants to force a fresh download.

---

Benchmarks (Tested on my machine)

• Local Build (npm run build): Dropped from ~19.75s down to ~6.15s (saving ~13.6 seconds per build).
• CLI Startup (time ./bin/run_bin config): Dropped from ~2.37s down to ~1.76s.
• Test Suite: All 382 tests passing cleanly.

---

Question for Maintainers

Does skipping the spec example download when examples.json already exists locally look okay to you, or would you prefer a different flag/approach for fetching examples during builds?

[github-actions]

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[devxdh]

@Souvikns @Shurtu-gal Please have a look.

[AayushSaini101]

@neoandmatrix can you please take a look on this thanks

[devxdh]

@neoandmatrix ping pong!

[neoandmatrix]

@neoandmatrix ping pong!

Finalizing some PRs. Will review shortly.

[devxdh]

@neoandmatrix ping pong!

[devxdh]

@neoandmatrix hey any updates?

[devxdh]

Okay, the review of this PR is taking too long. So I'm making it ready for review right away. I will be instantly available for follow-ups and requested changes.