docs: remove the Legacy tab - #2280
Conversation
…a, bridge guides, operator FAQ)
…60 legacy redirects
… fences, frontmatter quotes
…ote, correct withdrawal finalization delay
| Validators historically produced blocks on the Celo L1; after the L2 migration they [serve the network as community RPC providers](/contribute-to-celo/community-rpc-nodes/community-rpc-node). The Celo community decides who fills this role by locking CELO and voting for [Validator Groups](/home/protocol/staking/validator-groups), intermediaries that sit between voters and Validators. Every Validator Group has an ordered list of up to 5 candidate Validators. Some organizations may operate a group with their own Validators in it; some may operate a group to which they have added Validators run by others. | ||
|
|
||
| <Note> | ||
| If you would like to keep up-to-date with all the news happening in the Celo community, including validation, node operation and governance, please sign up to our [Celo Signal mailing list here](https://share.hsforms.com/1Qrhush1vSA2WIamd_yL4ow53n4j). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this still the right process?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fact-check from the review pass, for whatever it helps: the mechanics on this page match the chain and the current docs — Election.maxNumGroupsVotedFor returns 10 on mainnet (verified via eth_call today), epoch processing is the permissionless EpochManager flow the community-RPC pages describe, and both Celo Signal links return 200. So the substance looks current; whether the framing (validators → community RPC providers) should lead harder is an editorial call.
| description: Connect a Celo account with off-chain identities and URLs through signed metadata files registered on the Accounts contract | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| This page is for validators, group operators, and tool builders who want to attach verifiable off-chain information to a Celo account. The Celo protocol's **metadata and claims** feature makes it possible to connect on-chain with off-chain identities. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
needs the validator disclaimer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: reuse the exact Note that home/protocol/staking/voting.mdx already carries — "The term 'validator' is used in the code and corresponding explanation due to historical reasons, but refers to the community RPC providers." — right under the intro paragraph, so both pages disclaim it identically.
| - [Chainlink, Price Feed Oracles](https://docs.chain.link/data-feeds/price-feeds/addresses?network=celo) | ||
| - [Band](/developer/oracles/band-protocol) | ||
| - [Celo Reserve Oracles](/legacy/protocol/stability/oracles) | ||
| - [Mento Oracles](https://www.mento.org/) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can you givwe the exact link? Can't find it on their page
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Found the canonical link — Mento's docs are JS-rendered so it's invisible to a page search, but their llms.txt lists it: https://docs.mento.org/mento-v3/build/integration/integrate-oracles (returns 200; there's also dive-deeper/fpmm/oracles-and-circuit-breakers for concepts). Suggest using the integrate-oracles link here instead of mento.org. Unrelated nit while here: the other bullets on this list still route through /developer/oracles/* redirect sources rather than the final paths — pre-existing, fine to leave for the Build-tab move.
|
On the ODIS key-hardening / PEAR deletion flag: deletion is fine — team understanding is that PEAR is deprecated, and the repo agrees:
Separately: the verification pass on this PR came back clean — redirect graph re-audited independently (692 entries, 0 chains, 0 dead ends, all 5 destination anchors resolve), |
The Legacy tab mixed three kinds of content: dead L1 documentation, current pages that were misfiled there (the Cel2 FAQ, the native-bridge guides, account metadata), and the only concept docs for staking mechanisms that still run on L2. This removes the tab and sorts its 60 pages: 13 move to where they belong, 2 fold into a new About Celo L1 history page, and 45 are deleted with a redirect to the live page that answers the same question. It follows the redirect standard from #2279: every destination is a final, in-nav page, and the 109 pre-existing redirects that pointed into legacy/ are re-pointed to the same targets. Closes #2254.
Changes
New and moved pages:
home/celo-l1distillslegacy/overviewandlegacy/l1-architecture: L1 history, the L1-vs-L2 comparison table, and one-line summaries of every retired mechanism, so the historical redirects land somewhere that explains what the reader was looking for.locked-celo,validator-elections,validator-groups,voting, and the three key-management pages. Stale L1 claims (BFT consensus, block production, consensus-signer restrictions) are stripped; elections are described via the EpochManager flow the specs and community-RPC pages document.home/protocol/metadata(fromlegacy/protocol/identity/metadata): the claims mechanism is what community RPC URL registration uses today, so it is live content, not identity history.infra-partners/operators/faq(fromlegacy/faq): a current operator FAQ that was only legacy by filing accident. The site-wide FAQs anchor follows it.home/bridged-tokens/bridging-celo-from-ethereumandhome/bridged-tokens/withdrawing-celo-to-ethereum(fromlegacy/transition/guides/): the native bridge is a permanent L2 feature, not migration history. Both guides carried addresses from a retired testnet deployment; they now use the current Celo SepoliaCeloTokenProxyandOptimismPortalProxyfromtooling/contracts/l1-contracts.Deletions: 45 pages, each diffed against its live counterpart before deleting. The full path-by-path mapping is in the classification comment on #2254. Ported during the diff pass: the Registry/
GoldTokenlookup intohome/protocol/celo-token, the keystore-extraction tip intoinfra-partners/operators/migrate-node, and the MaxCodeSize change intospecs/l2-migration.Redirects: 60 new
/legacy/*entries, 128 existing destinations re-pointed, the/what-is-celo/about-celo-l1/:slug*wildcard now lands on/home/celo-l1, and about 30 content links intolegacy/*fixed.Facts checked on chain while editing: the bridge addresses (
eth_getCodeon Ethereum Sepolia; the old guide addresses have no code behind them),Election.maxNumGroupsVotedFor= 10 (the moved locked-CELO page said 3), andproofMaturityDelaySeconds= 604800 on the Celo Sepolia portal (the withdrawal guide claimed finalization takes about 2 minutes; it takes 7 days).Verification
The orphan set is the base branch's 25 minus the two legacy pages that were themselves orphaned; no page added here is orphaned. A redirect audit over all 692 entries confirms every destination resolves to a page on disk, is listed in navigation, and is not itself a redirect source. Anchors used in redirects and re-pointed links were checked by hand, since the link checker ignores anchors.
Not verified: the two bridge code examples were not executed end to end (that needs a funded Sepolia account holding CELO); their addresses and the challenge period were verified on chain instead.
Flags
identity/odis-use-case-key-hardeningandidentity/encrypted-cloud-backuphad no live equivalent. Deleting them assumes no current wallet still uses ODIS key hardening or PEAR backup; speak up before merge if that is wrong.tooling/libraries-sdks/contractkit/odisbecause the canonical SocialConnect page is one of the 23 known orphans, and orphans cannot be redirect targets. When task: Orphaned-pages audit — re-nav or delete the 22 pages on disk that are missing from navigation #2253 adds it to navigation, these can be tightened.