Update the multiple_solvers test output - #116
Merged
daniel-larraz merged 1 commit intoAug 12, 2026
Merged
Conversation
cvc5 changed the error message reported when a term outside the declared logic reaches preprocessing: "got a theory atom for that theory" is now "got a preprocessing-time term for that theory", and the term printed is the offending subterm `(* 2 y)` rather than the atom `(= x (* 2 y))`. Refresh the expected output accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Author
@alex-ozdemir , I need your approval to merge the PR. |
alex-ozdemir
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2026
Member
|
My apologies! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CI has been failing on
mainsince cvc5 changed the error message reported when a term outside the declared logic reaches preprocessing:The term printed is now the offending subterm
(* 2 y)rather than the enclosing atom(= x (* 2 y)). This refreshes the expected output, same as #112 did forgetOptionInfo.multiple_solvers.pyis the only example affected; the full suite passes with this change.