Skip to content

docs: fix grammar in code comments - #3431

Open
reddaisyy wants to merge 1 commit into
evstack:mainfrom
reddaisyy:main
Open

docs: fix grammar in code comments#3431
reddaisyy wants to merge 1 commit into
evstack:mainfrom
reddaisyy:main

Conversation

@reddaisyy

@reddaisyy reddaisyy commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overview

fix grammar in code comments

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected grammar in configuration parsing documentation.
    • Improved wording in documentation for Evolve height keys.

Signed-off-by: reddaisyy <reddaisy@outlook.jp>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 131015c3-76bb-4432-bbb9-a6e7920b306d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c88745 and a422717.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pkg/cmd/run_node.go
  • pkg/store/keys.go

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Two exported comments now use correct article grammar. No implementation or runtime behavior changed.

Changes

Comment grammar corrections

Layer / File(s) Summary
Exported comment updates
pkg/cmd/run_node.go, pkg/store/keys.go
Corrected the comments for ParseConfig and HeightToDAHeightKey.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to a4227

This PR only fixes grammar in code comments and introduces no actionable merge-blocking risk; it is merge-ready after normal checks and review.

Suggested reviewers: tac0turtle

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the grammar corrections made in code comments.
Description check ✅ Passed The description includes the required Overview section and briefly explains that the changes fix grammar in code comments.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.43%. Comparing base (5c88745) to head (a422717).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3431      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.46%   62.43%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         121      121              
  Lines       13469    13469              
==========================================
- Hits         8413     8409       -4     
- Misses       4114     4117       +3     
- Partials      942      943       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
combined 62.43% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant