Update Rust to nightly-2026-08-22

[hash-dependencies]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change	Pending
rust (source, changelog)	toolchain	patch	nightly-2026-08-03 → nightly-2026-08-22	nightly-2026-09-05 (+13)

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate CLI.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
hash	Ready	Preview	Sep 5, 2026 1:04am UTC
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Sep 5, 2026 1:04am UTC
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Sep 5, 2026 1:04am UTC
petrinaut-docs	Ready	Preview	Sep 5, 2026 1:04am UTC

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Single-version pin change with no application logic or dependency manifest updates in this diff.

Overview
Updates the pinned Rust toolchain in rust-toolchain.toml from nightly-2026-08-03 to nightly-2026-08-22. The listed toolchain components (rustfmt, clippy, llvm-tools, miri, rust-src, rust-analyzer, rustc-codegen-cranelift) are unchanged.

This is a routine nightly bump for local development, CI, and Docker builds that read the idiomatic toolchain file.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 4ec49a9. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.89%. Comparing base (eea4e1f) to head (4ec49a9).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9250   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.89%   60.89%           
=======================================
  Files        1461     1461           
  Lines      146725   146725           
  Branches     6744     6744           
=======================================
  Hits        89343    89343           
  Misses      56264    56264           
  Partials     1118     1118           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.99% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	15.41% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	38.15% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	3.27% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	12.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	2.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.21% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-config	74.74% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authentication	96.02% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	63.14% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	32.15% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	48.41% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	50.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-middleware	90.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	78.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 1.44%

⚠️ 6 benchmarks measured no execution time

Nothing ran under measurement, usually because the compiler removed the code under test. These results are not comparable, so they count as unchanged.

Preventing compiler optimizations

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 70 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 24 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]	140.8 ns	170 ns	-17.16%
❌	bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]	185.8 ns	215 ns	-13.57%
⚡	pattern_match_constant	209.2 ns	180 ns	+16.2%
⚡	type_checker_simulation	497.5 ns	438.6 ns	+13.43%
⚠️	as_constant	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	constant_equal	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	constant_not_equal	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	access	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	runtime_equal	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	runtime_not_equal	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing deps/rust-1.x (4ec49a9) with main (4854d5f)²}

Footnotes

1. 24 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on main (26af45b) during the generation of this report, so 4854d5f was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[cursor]

Mise lockfile left on old nightly

High Severity

rust-toolchain.toml now pins nightly-2026-08-06, but .config/mise/mise.lock still records nightly-2026-08-03. mise reads the toolchain file (idiomatic_version_file_enable_tools) and CI runs mise install --locked, so the lockfile is stale relative to the requested toolchain and install can fail or resolve the old compiler.

 

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 940a5db. Configure here.}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$21.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.864 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$35.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$21.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$22.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.306 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$1.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.80 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.628 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.761 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.283 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.377 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.002 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.64 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.379 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$35.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.735 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$25.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$34.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.678 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$32.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$72.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.146 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$218 \mathrm{ms} \pm 720 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.530 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$8.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$8.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$8.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$8.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.006 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$8.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$8.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 45.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.879 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$8.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$8.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.776 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$8.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.424 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$8.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$8.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$8.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$8.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$8.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.611 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$8.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.408 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$8.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.481 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$9.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$8.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$8.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$6.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$49.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$94.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 531 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$56.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 411 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 431 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$70.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 470 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$74.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 441 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.500 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$37.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.727 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$60.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$42.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$49.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$52.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.47 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$51.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 393 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$97.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 470 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 418 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$426 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.37 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

There are 2 total unresolved issues (including 1 from previous review).

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 42192be. Configure here.}