[WRONG BRANCH] fix(cli): mark access-key usage as unavailable when attribution is absent

[luvs01]

Motivation

• Prevent the human-readable ocx access key list from misleading operators by printing numeric zeros and "never" when the server has not provided dataset-level attribution (attributionSince).
• Align CLI behavior with the GUI, which already treats a missing attribution boundary as unavailable rather than claiming zero usage.

Description

• Change formatKeyRows in src/cli/access.ts to inspect payload.attributionSince and treat usage as unavailable when that field is absent, printing unavailable in the request-count column and suppressing numeric/"never" output in that case.
• Preserve the existing rendering for the ambiguous discriminant and for genuine numeric/never-used cases when attributionSince is present.
• Add a focused regression test in tests/cli-dto-fidelity.test.ts that supplies attributionSince for the numeric cases and adds a new test asserting the CLI prints unavailable (and not 0 or never) when attribution is missing.

Testing

• Ran the focused suite ./node_modules/.bin/bun test tests/cli-dto-fidelity.test.ts, which passed (all tests in that file green).
• Ran bun run typecheck and bun run privacy:scan, both of which succeeded.
• Attempted a full ./node_modules/.bin/bun run test; the full repository test run exercised many unrelated areas and surfaced pre-existing failures in lab and integration tests that are outside the scope of this focused formatting fix.

---

Codex Task

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-08-30T05:50:17.813295Z	0eb64cc	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[github-actions]

✅ Deterministic PR hygiene checks passed.

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: ef50a845-3c73-4bbb-a646-53125552da58

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

⏳ DRAFT

• wrong target branch (main); retarget to dev.

What to do

• Retarget this PR to dev — all contributions go to dev.

Its title has been prefixed with [WRONG BRANCH].
This pull request was already a draft. Its draft status will be preserved after every issue above is resolved.