Skip to content

[ci] E: Update Nanvix SDK - #176

Merged
ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v2.12.9from
automation/update-nanvix-version
Sep 5, 2026
Merged

[ci] E: Update Nanvix SDK#176
ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v2.12.9from
automation/update-nanvix-version

Conversation

@ppenna

@ppenna ppenna commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Automated coherent update to verified Nanvix SDK v0.24.15-sdk.1. The manifest and lockfile were generated atomically by the target zutils implementation.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 5, 2026 13:14

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot review overview

🟢 Approval recommended

The manifest and lockfile updates are consistent (versions/digests/commit hashes align) and no stale 0.24.14 references remain in the repo.

Review tier: Lite
Findings: None

What changed in this PR

Updates the repository’s Nanvix build metadata to use the verified Nanvix SDK v0.24.15-sdk.1, keeping the manifest and lockfile in sync for reproducible Nanvix builds.

Changes:

  • Bump nanvix-version from 0.24.14 to 0.24.15 in the Nanvix manifest.
  • Update SDK image version/digest and associated lock metadata (commit, sysroot hash, asset URLs/IDs) for v0.24.15-sdk.1.
File Description
.nanvix/​nanvix.toml Updates the declared Nanvix OS + SDK version and SDK image digest.
.nanvix/​nanvix.lock Regenerates the lock metadata to match the new SDK release and resolved artifacts.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@ppenna
ppenna merged commit 4f9d86a into nanvix/v2.12.9 Sep 5, 2026
13 of 14 checks passed
@ppenna
ppenna deleted the automation/update-nanvix-version branch September 5, 2026 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants