Add tls scanner 5.0/5.1 release jobs - #3938
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: automatic mode |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 10 remain after this review. WalkthroughThe OpenShift customization configuration adds TLS Scanner Presubmit patterns for the 5.0 and 5.1 release streams. ChangesTLS Scanner configuration
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This PR adds release-job configuration in one file. No actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review. Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 21✅ Passed checks (21 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: richardsonnick The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
The periodic-tls13-adherence-* jobs (added via openshift/release#83621 and expanded in #83763) were never being ingested by Sippy: neither release's generated config listed them under jobs: or regexp:, so matchRelease() dropped every run before it reached the DB despite the jobs actually running on their 24h schedule. config/openshift.yaml is generated by sippy-config-generator and overwritten on every run, so the selectors are added to config/openshift-customizations.yaml, the overlay the generator reads for cases its auto-discovery misses (see config/README.md).
78bd9ff to
fff97a6
Compare
|
Scheduling required tests: |
|
@richardsonnick: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Hi — some folks from TRT reviewed this PR and have feedback on the approach. Release association should use the
|
Summary by CodeRabbit