Fix OCPBUGS-107725: CVE-2026-41178 - #613
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: German Parente <gparente@redhat.com> rh-pre-commit.version: 2.4.0 rh-pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
|
@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-107725, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: germanparente The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
5.0 is already in 0.44. So: /label jira/skip-dependent-bug-check |
|
@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-107725, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 4 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/test lint |
|
The base branch already has go 1.25.0. So this lint failure affects the base branch too — it just happened that previous PRs ran before the go version was bumped. This is a pre-existing issue not caused by our PR. The lint failure is not related to PR #613. The base branch (release-4.22) has go 1.25.0 in its go.mod, but the CI uses golangci-lint v1.64.8 which was built with Go 1.24 and refuses to lint Go 1.25 code. This is a base branch infrastructure issue that needs the golangci-lint version bumped upstream — nothing we need to fix in our CVE PR. |
|
@germanparente: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
the
|
Summary
propagation.Baggage{}as a text map propagator, making it vulnerableTest plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code