Skip to content

Clarify new_data() docs and fix broken links - #113

Merged
joethorley merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
new-data-docs-98
Sep 9, 2026
Merged

joethorley merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
new-data-docs-98

Conversation

@joethorley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes #98

  • States that new_data() is superseded by xnew_data() but remains fully functional, and that the deprecated ref and obs_only arguments still work but warn.
  • Fixes the function references that were written as [foo()] inside backticks, which rendered as ``verb`` with no hyperlink. They are now proper links.
  • Replaces the incorrect pointer to xnew_value() for ref with the actual replacement (naming the value in xnew_data()).
  • Adds an xnew_data() equivalent to the examples.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Closes #98

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@StefanoMezzini StefanoMezzini left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good; just a minor change

Comment thread R/new-data.R
joethorley and others added 2 commits September 9, 2026 07:19
Co-authored-by: Stefano Mezzini <stefano@poissonconsulting.ca>
@StefanoMezzini

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The docs needed to be updated after the change

@joethorley
joethorley merged commit 012ba62 into main Sep 9, 2026
11 checks passed
@joethorley
joethorley deleted the new-data-docs-98 branch September 9, 2026 18:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

new_data() has unclear and poorly formatted doc

2 participants