Skip to content

feat: ci improvement - #31

Open
dzdidi wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
feat/ci-improvements
Open

feat: ci improvement#31
dzdidi wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
feat/ci-improvements

Conversation

@dzdidi

@dzdidi dzdidi commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Contract and risk impact

  • Public API or SDK contract
  • Persisted data or migration
  • Authentication, authorization, identity, or secret handling
  • Payment or entitlement behavior
  • Runtime, deployment, or observability
  • No contract/risk impact

Verification

Documentation

Checklist

  • The change is focused and self-reviewed.
  • Regression tests were added where practical.
  • No credentials, identities, private content, payment material, or generated local state are included.
  • Formatting and relevant tests/lints pass.

Signed-off-by: dzdidi <dzdidi@users.noreply.github.com>
@dzdidi
dzdidi requested review from Taewa and ben-kaufman August 26, 2026 16:43
Comment thread CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/check.yml Outdated
Comment thread CONTRIBUTING.md
dzdidi added 3 commits August 26, 2026 15:18
Signed-off-by: dzdidi <dzdidi@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: dzdidi <dzdidi@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: dzdidi <dzdidi@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment thread CONTRIBUTING.md
ephemeral local PostgreSQL service. Do not claim the full suite passed when only a subset
ran.

`./scripts/check` preserves a caller-provided `TEST_DATABASE_URL`. When it is unset, the

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

scripts/check still omits legacy_connect_shell_http and pubky_homeserver_repositories when TEST_DATABASE_URL is unset, even though both are non-PostgreSQL and the CI Rust lane runs them. Could we run those two unconditionally with the other E2E targets so this documented no-database path covers all non-database checks?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants