[stable] 1.98.1 release - #161555
Conversation
|
r? @davidtwco rustbot has assigned @davidtwco. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
no idea if this is correct for a stable backport xd |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
0237223 to
c10713e
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Normally we would just label the original PR and discuss from there, but that's ok. Did the object test come from a different PR? |
Summary: D117423626 rust-lang/rust#161441 Miscompilation on 1.98.0 stable, waiting for PR rust-lang/rust#161555 before 1.98.1 release. In the meantime, revert the 1.98.0 bump and wait. Reviewed By: dtolnay Differential Revision: D117431620 fbshipit-source-id: 7f93e5654ba6c2783e7411df47b62a1c3fdcc32c
Summary: D117423626 rust-lang/rust#161441 Miscompilation on 1.98.0 stable, waiting for PR rust-lang/rust#161555 before 1.98.1 release. In the meantime, revert the 1.98.0 bump and wait. Reviewed By: dtolnay Differential Revision: D117431620 fbshipit-source-id: 7f93e5654ba6c2783e7411df47b62a1c3fdcc32c
Summary: D117423626 rust-lang/rust#161441 Miscompilation on 1.98.0 stable, waiting for PR rust-lang/rust#161555 before 1.98.1 release. In the meantime, revert the 1.98.0 bump and wait. Reviewed By: dtolnay Differential Revision: D117431620 fbshipit-source-id: 7f93e5654ba6c2783e7411df47b62a1c3fdcc32c
Summary: D117423626 rust-lang/rust#161441 Miscompilation on 1.98.0 stable, waiting for PR rust-lang/rust#161555 before 1.98.1 release. In the meantime, revert the 1.98.0 bump and wait. Reviewed By: dtolnay Differential Revision: D117431620 fbshipit-source-id: 7f93e5654ba6c2783e7411df47b62a1c3fdcc32c
Summary: D117423626 rust-lang/rust#161441 Miscompilation on 1.98.0 stable, waiting for PR rust-lang/rust#161555 before 1.98.1 release. In the meantime, revert the 1.98.0 bump and wait. Reviewed By: dtolnay Differential Revision: D117431620 fbshipit-source-id: 7f93e5654ba6c2783e7411df47b62a1c3fdcc32c
Summary: D117423626 rust-lang/rust#161441 Miscompilation on 1.98.0 stable, waiting for PR rust-lang/rust#161555 before 1.98.1 release. In the meantime, revert the 1.98.0 bump and wait. Reviewed By: dtolnay Differential Revision: D117431620 fbshipit-source-id: 7f93e5654ba6c2783e7411df47b62a1c3fdcc32c
|
💔 Test for e9727ee failed: CI. Failed job:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
@bors retry |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
[stable] 1.98.1 release Backport of "rerun in original typing mode if we meet any opaques in post analysis" #158993 to stable, fixes #161441 We didn't notice that a beta cutoff happened between #156742 and #158993 and it's easy to forget that we need to be careful with next-solver bugs as they can affect stable via coherence and `impossible_predicates`.
|
💔 Test for 5793c24 failed: CI. Failed job:
|
|
That looks like the cache problem that I hit on beta #161422 too: ... and I ultimately had to give that a unique cache-busting value (beta-1) before it would pass. |
(cherry picked and altered to random value from commit 93a81b4)
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=100 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
[stable] 1.98.1 release Backport of "rerun in original typing mode if we meet any opaques in post analysis" #158993 to stable, fixes #161441 We didn't notice that a beta cutoff happened between #156742 and #158993 and it's easy to forget that we need to be careful with next-solver bugs as they can affect stable via coherence and `impossible_predicates`.
|
Not gonna finish in time, let's retry |
|
Auto build was cancelled. Cancelled workflows: The next pull request likely to be tested is #161555. |
View all comments
Backport of "rerun in original typing mode if we meet any opaques in post analysis" #158993 to stable, fixes #161441
We didn't notice that a beta cutoff happened between #156742 and #158993 and it's easy to forget that we need to be careful with next-solver bugs as they can affect stable via coherence and
impossible_predicates.