Add an Unlikely Changes section to the Examples

[niazim3]

As mentioned in issue #47, a section for Unlikely Changes can be added to the examples if deemed fit. Please check them off as the task is looked into.

• GlassBR : @samm82
• GamePhysics : @Mornix @deviprasad135
• SWHS : @elwazana
• NoPCM : @elwazana

---

• Add Unlikely Changes to Table of Acronyms and Abbreviations @niazim3
• Add Unlikely Changes to list in Assumptions @samm82

Upon getting the changes in the manual versions approved by @smiths, please propagate the changes to Drasil. A format similar to JacquesCarette/Drasil#685 can be followed.

[samm82]

@smiths Can I propagate fd161a2 to Drasil?

[smiths]

@samm82, after you make the changes I noted in the above cited commit, yes, go ahead and propagate to Drasil.

[samm82]

@smiths Is 521248e better?

[smiths]

Sounds good.

[samm82]

@smiths Should we be adding Unlikely Change to this table...

...and this list?

[smiths]

Yes and yes. I really like the idea of adding traceability to unlikely changes to the assumptions. I hadn't thought of that previously, but it is great information to capture explicitly. @szymczdm and @JacquesCarette will likely see a connection between Ernie Mileta's simplifications versus limitations. I believe we could translate our assumptions to Ernie's categories if we added information about likely versus unlikely.

[samm82]

@smiths Should we make the changes to the table and list in caseStudies as well?