Skip to content

chore: stop auto-requesting Erik as a reviewer - #1072

Merged
frahlg merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
cursor/quiet-erik-review-pings-fca7
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

chore: stop auto-requesting Erik as a reviewer#1072
frahlg merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
cursor/quiet-erik-review-pings-fca7

Conversation

@frahlg

@frahlg frahlg commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Accepted text proposal

Discord #dev-core, 2026-09-04: Erik asked that the GitHub bot stop pinging him a few times a day. Pings should still work when a human actually wants his attention.

What changed

Cursor's PR Routing agent (cursor[bot]) has been requesting Erik — and often Johan — as reviewers on almost every agent PR, from commit history rather than CODEOWNERS. The GitHub Discord bot turns those review requests into pings, and it keeps doing it on later pushes whether or not anyone responds.

This PR tells that agent, and coding agents, to request GitHub reviews only from CODEOWNERS for paths the PR actually changes:

  • APPROVAL_POLICY.md — Cursor's documented override for reviewer selection
  • .cursor/approval-policies/ROUTING.md — points the router at that policy
  • AGENTS.md / .github/CODEOWNERS — same rule for coding agents; Erik is not a CODEOWNER

Humans can still request him by hand when it is something real.

Why

He is about to mute the repo. He was already removed as web CODEOWNER; the routing agent never noticed and kept picking him from git history.

Boundaries and safety

No runtime behaviour changes. CODEOWNERS review for drivers, Lua host, release/CI and agent rules is unchanged. Web/UI still needs a human looking at the rendered page; that is still not a GitHub review request.

Verification

Draft PR #969 also edits AGENTS.md (a Cloud Agent layout section at the bottom). This only adds a bullet in "Working alongside other people"; the hunks should not collide.

No changeset: markdown-only, auto-exempt.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Cursor's PR routing agent picks reviewers from commit history, so
cursor[bot] has been requesting @erikarenhill on almost every agent
PR. The GitHub Discord bot then pings him a few times a day.

Request reviews only from CODEOWNERS for changed paths. He is not
one. Humans can still request him when they actually need him.

Signed-off-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>

Co-authored-by: Fredrik Ahlgren <fredrik@sourceful-labs.com>
@frahlg
frahlg marked this pull request as ready for review September 4, 2026 07:12
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-04T07:14:03.400072Z 0b0401b Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@frahlg
frahlg merged commit 3193e84 into master Sep 4, 2026
17 checks passed

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a non-blocking comment; no reviewers assigned. Cursor Bugbot passed with no findings, but this PR introduces approval-policy and routing files that do not authorize auto-approval, so CODEOWNERS review is still required. The matching CODEOWNER is the PR author, so I did not add a review request.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router and Approver

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants