Ticket ID
two-app-reuse-lifecycle
Spec
docs/two-app-reuse-contract.md / ADR 0006 — shared pin meeting-notes.process 1.3.2 for meeting-notes + loop
docs/decision-log.md — 2026-09-05 Blocked tickets ownership walk (fixture-only lifecycle DoD)
- Upstream context: Traverse #1168 (reuse proof). This ticket does not require BundleEmbedder /
two-app-reuse-host-execute
- No private Traverse internals; no UI business fields; App-Refs does not author WASM
Summary
Prove compatible-upgrade and deprecation consumer outcomes for the two-app shared pin using fixture-level pin flip + documented deprecation handling. Explicit non-claim: this is not a production registry release-train proof and not a public BundleEmbedder host proof.
Why
Execute/evidence tickets (#286/#287) already show both apps on immutable 1.3.2. Lifecycle still needs a checkable App-Refs story for “what happens when the pin must move or the release is deprecated,” without waiting on a new published meeting-notes.process or on Traverse #1240.
Depends on
two-app-reuse-contract / two-app-reuse-execute / two-app-reuse-execute-ci (Done)
Blocked by
- None (Ready). Intentionally not blocked on
two-app-reuse-host-execute / Traverse #1240.
Definition of Done
Validation
# Exact command(s) added by the implementing PR — must be documented in this ticket’s PR body
bash scripts/ci/repository_checks.sh
Non-goals
- Waiting for a new public registry publish of
meeting-notes.process
- Requiring BundleEmbedder /
meeting-notes-cli / loop-cli success (that remains two-app-reuse-host-execute)
- Changing registry deprecation policy in Traverse/registry
- Claiming Traverse #1168 fully closed solely by this fixture proof
Outcome
Claimable Ready work that completes an honest App-Refs lifecycle slice for the two-app pin without overclaiming host or release-train proof.
Ticket ID
two-app-reuse-lifecycleSpec
docs/two-app-reuse-contract.md/ ADR 0006 — shared pinmeeting-notes.process1.3.2 formeeting-notes+loopdocs/decision-log.md— 2026-09-05 Blocked tickets ownership walk (fixture-only lifecycle DoD)two-app-reuse-host-executeSummary
Prove compatible-upgrade and deprecation consumer outcomes for the two-app shared pin using fixture-level pin flip + documented deprecation handling. Explicit non-claim: this is not a production registry release-train proof and not a public BundleEmbedder host proof.
Why
Execute/evidence tickets (#286/#287) already show both apps on immutable
1.3.2. Lifecycle still needs a checkable App-Refs story for “what happens when the pin must move or the release is deprecated,” without waiting on a new publishedmeeting-notes.processor on Traverse #1240.Depends on
two-app-reuse-contract/two-app-reuse-execute/two-app-reuse-execute-ci(Done)Blocked by
two-app-reuse-host-execute/ Traverse #1240.Definition of Done
meeting-notes.process1.3.2 (digest indocs/two-app-reuse-contract.md), then perform a fixture-only pin flip to a second digest-pinned fixture release (or documented stand-in path) and record per-app choice: advance vs remain pinned, with compatibility rationalescripts/ci/or extension of existing two-app reuse evidence) exits 0 on the happy fixture path and non-zero on an unsupported/deprecated-only resolution casedocs/two-app-reuse-contract.md,AGENTS.mdrow) state clearly: fixture-only; not production release-train proof; not BundleEmbedder host proofbash scripts/ci/repository_checks.shgreenValidation
# Exact command(s) added by the implementing PR — must be documented in this ticket’s PR body bash scripts/ci/repository_checks.shNon-goals
meeting-notes.processmeeting-notes-cli/loop-clisuccess (that remainstwo-app-reuse-host-execute)Outcome
Claimable Ready work that completes an honest App-Refs lifecycle slice for the two-app pin without overclaiming host or release-train proof.