Relicense under Apache-2.0 - #33
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Replace the GNU General Public License v3.0 with the Apache License 2.0,
copyright Vert Inc. Apache-2.0 carries an explicit patent grant and is the
conventional choice for developer tooling.
The eBPF objects keep their SEC("license") = "GPL" declaration: the kernel
requires a GPL-compatible declaration to permit the GPL-only helpers these
programs call, and changing it would cause the verifier to reject them at load.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replaces GPL-3.0 with the Apache License 2.0, copyright Vert Inc.
Apache-2.0 carries an explicit patent grant and patent-retaliation clause, which GPL-3.0 also has but MIT lacks, and it is the conventional license for developer tooling — corporate legal review clears it without the case-by-case scrutiny GPL attracts. Since these scripts are how people first encounter yeet, copyleft was friction in the wrong place.
The eBPF objects intentionally keep
SEC("license") = "GPL". That string is a kernel ABI requirement, not documentation: the verifier rejects programs calling GPL-only helpers unless they declare a GPL-compatible license. Changing it would break every script at load time. Shipping Apache-2.0 userspace alongside GPL-declared BPF objects is standard practice.No
.bpf.c, toolchain header, or Dockerfile was modified.